![]() |
|||
|
|
Chicken Pox VaccineJim Davis, D.C., F.I.C.P.A., I.C.P.A.. Diplomate Candidate Jan-feb 2003 Chicken pox is usually a mild disease in children. However, the push
to mandate this vaccine for a relatively harmless disease of childhood
(90 % of cases are in children < 10 years of age who have mild and
rarely severe complications), stems from the high complications and mortality
rate among high risk individuals. These groups of people are for whom
the vaccine was originally designed. Those groups include children with
leukemia or persons receiving steroids (given to persons with cancer,
organ transplants, kidney disease and asthma.) Steroids are known to be
immuno-supressors, leaving some people defenseless against what would
normally be harmless diseases (9). These immuno-suppressed persons comprise
only .1% of all chicken pox cases, yet constitutes the majority of chicken
pox complications.(1,2,3) Adults are another high risk group for complications from chicken pox.
Adults comprise only 2% of chicken pox cases, but are responsible for
55% of deaths. Besides the obvious lack of knowledge on protection against complications
from the chicken pox vaccine and by quite possibly causing more harm by
delaying the disease until adulthood, we should investigate the most current
data regarding what should matter most: deaths related to chicken pox. Dr. Walter Orenstein, Director, CDC National Immunization Program, described
being kept up for several nights with his five-year-old during a bout
of chicken pox, admitting, "It's this kind of problem that the vaccine
would help eliminate rather than serious disease"(6). According to
the World Health Organization the United States is the only county in
the world who has the chicken pox vaccine on its vaccine schedule. Are
we so far advanced in our thinking compared to the rest of the world,
or are we too willing to jump on the "any vaccine bandwagon"
without appropriate testing (let alone need) of the chicken pox vaccine?
It also appears that the chicken pox vaccine may cause an increase risk
for developing shingles (7,8). Some have also suggested a re-evaluation
of the mass chicken pox vaccination policy until we know exactly what
the increased incidence of shingles will be. Scientists estimate as a
result of varicella vaccination there will be an increase of 100 deaths
per year from the shingles. Coincidently, this is approximate number of
chicken pox related deaths per year. Looking at the MMWR post-vaccination death rates and the possible added
deaths due to the increase in shingles, it appears we may be increasing
the overall deaths by giving the vaccine. This does not even include the
number of deaths caused by side effects of the vaccine. Even with data
such as this, the logical thinking to stop and re-evaluate the current
policy and to look closer at the shingles/varicella vaccine association
is not being done. Instead of examining this relationship, a large study
is underway for the development of a shingles vaccine. Is it any coincidence
the company researching this new vaccine is also the same company that
produces the varicella vaccine? The Varivax vaccine earns Merck nearly
one billion dollars per year, will this new shingles vaccine earn the
same? Will it create new side effects, which will lead to increased incidence
of some other malady, causing the "need" for another vaccine?
Vaccines to treat problems caused by vaccines. Sounds like and interesting
and profitable business plan. The chicken pox virus does not kill. The complications due to the disease cause potential problems to high risk individuals. Those are the people the vaccine was originally designed for and those are the individuals that should be vaccinated. The varicella vaccine has insufficient evidence that it reduces the complications of chicken pox and has not affected death rates (at least in a positive manner) since being introduced in 1995. We do not know if it will push the onset of chicken pox into adulthood where it is 25 times more likely to become lethal. Let parents decide if they want to give their child yet another vaccine, but please do not allow them to be misinformed and allow their children to be used as experimental subjects without giving them all of the facts to help them make an informed decision. This article was submitted by Jim Davis, DC, FICPA and Candidate for the ICPA Diplomate program. References provided on-line at:
|
||
|
Contact Us
| Site Map
| Copyright
© I.C.P.A. |
Please Read Our Disclaimer |
|||